<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Proven Salesletter Formula For Problem-Solving Products</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.JohnRitz.com/blog/a-proven-salesletter-formula-for-problem-solving-products/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.JohnRitz.com/blog/a-proven-salesletter-formula-for-problem-solving-products/</link>
	<description>A discussion of modern and proven marketing techniques, copywriting, and strategies for all businesses.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 07:18:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: siva123</title>
		<link>http://www.JohnRitz.com/blog/a-proven-salesletter-formula-for-problem-solving-products/comment-page-1/#comment-37500</link>
		<dc:creator>siva123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.JohnRitz.com/blog/?p=276#comment-37500</guid>
		<description>Its sounds good, the information is very productive and informative. Marketing firms are now offering few of the services like creative design, consumer data, printing, fulfillment, analytics and website solutions. Good to see these kinds of services.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its sounds good, the information is very productive and informative. Marketing firms are now offering few of the services like creative design, consumer data, printing, fulfillment, analytics and website solutions. Good to see these kinds of services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Kemp</title>
		<link>http://www.JohnRitz.com/blog/a-proven-salesletter-formula-for-problem-solving-products/comment-page-1/#comment-37467</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Kemp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 00:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.JohnRitz.com/blog/?p=276#comment-37467</guid>
		<description>John:
   I really like this video, as it takes us back to the old advertising masters of antiquity.  Many have made referrence to these old principles (I.E. - Clayton Makepeace and Ben Hart).  I plan on viewing all the videos you generated.  Thanks again for providing this service.
Randy

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Randy Kemp’s last blog post: &lt;a href=&quot;http://randylewiskemp.wordpress.com/2009/04/19/internet-marketing-ready-fire-aim/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Internet Marketing - Ready, Fire, Aim&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John:<br />
   I really like this video, as it takes us back to the old advertising masters of antiquity.  Many have made referrence to these old principles (I.E. &#8211; Clayton Makepeace and Ben Hart).  I plan on viewing all the videos you generated.  Thanks again for providing this service.<br />
Randy</p>
<p><abbr><em>Randy Kemp’s last blog post: <a href="http://randylewiskemp.wordpress.com/2009/04/19/internet-marketing-ready-fire-aim/" rel="nofollow">Internet Marketing &#8211; Ready, Fire, Aim</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Ritz</title>
		<link>http://www.JohnRitz.com/blog/a-proven-salesletter-formula-for-problem-solving-products/comment-page-1/#comment-37457</link>
		<dc:creator>John Ritz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.JohnRitz.com/blog/?p=276#comment-37457</guid>
		<description>Hi, Kevin.

Great question! You can definitely use problem/agitate/solve on a passionate market, but generally when they still have a problem that needs solving.

Take the golfer&#039;s &quot;short game&quot; niche example. A golfer&#039;s short game is where all those strokes are racked up. It&#039;s also the biggest opportunity for reducing the most strokes off his game.

You have a passionate niche to begin with, but they also have a problem (slashing those extra strokes off their game).

So problem/agitate/solve could work in that situation.

Now look at a fan of gourmet cooking. That kind of prospect is just not going to have a problem like the golfer does. You could argue that maybe the gourmet has to prepare a big meal for a lot of guests and needs a quick solution to feeding a lot of people on a limited budget.

But that&#039;s a different sub-niche. You cannot create a desire where one does not already exist. If you&#039;re talking about that kind of scenario, then you are not targeting your core target market. You are moving your scope slightly to the left or the right.

And so I wouldn&#039;t go with problem/agitate/solve for the gourmet cook market.

And finally, it&#039;s easy to get caught up in the &#039;ol &quot;if all I have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail&quot; syndrome.

There are plenty of other &quot;in the trenches&quot; formulas besides P/A/S, and I&#039;ll cover some of them ahead as well.

In other words, don&#039;t go looking for a problem to solve where none exists. Or equally as bad, don&#039;t try to solve the WRONG problem.

This is where knowing your prospects very well makes all the difference. It all comes back to your prospects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Kevin.</p>
<p>Great question! You can definitely use problem/agitate/solve on a passionate market, but generally when they still have a problem that needs solving.</p>
<p>Take the golfer&#8217;s &#8220;short game&#8221; niche example. A golfer&#8217;s short game is where all those strokes are racked up. It&#8217;s also the biggest opportunity for reducing the most strokes off his game.</p>
<p>You have a passionate niche to begin with, but they also have a problem (slashing those extra strokes off their game).</p>
<p>So problem/agitate/solve could work in that situation.</p>
<p>Now look at a fan of gourmet cooking. That kind of prospect is just not going to have a problem like the golfer does. You could argue that maybe the gourmet has to prepare a big meal for a lot of guests and needs a quick solution to feeding a lot of people on a limited budget.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s a different sub-niche. You cannot create a desire where one does not already exist. If you&#8217;re talking about that kind of scenario, then you are not targeting your core target market. You are moving your scope slightly to the left or the right.</p>
<p>And so I wouldn&#8217;t go with problem/agitate/solve for the gourmet cook market.</p>
<p>And finally, it&#8217;s easy to get caught up in the &#8216;ol &#8220;if all I have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail&#8221; syndrome.</p>
<p>There are plenty of other &#8220;in the trenches&#8221; formulas besides P/A/S, and I&#8217;ll cover some of them ahead as well.</p>
<p>In other words, don&#8217;t go looking for a problem to solve where none exists. Or equally as bad, don&#8217;t try to solve the WRONG problem.</p>
<p>This is where knowing your prospects very well makes all the difference. It all comes back to your prospects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Dawson</title>
		<link>http://www.JohnRitz.com/blog/a-proven-salesletter-formula-for-problem-solving-products/comment-page-1/#comment-37435</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Dawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.JohnRitz.com/blog/?p=276#comment-37435</guid>
		<description>John,
Simple but important point about them reading your stuff to solve a problem.  NOT to buy your product.  At least, not at first...

And I agree with the Gene Schwartz Stuff, too.  I&#039;ve made my clients a lot of money by following his stuff.

And I appreciated the differentiation about agitating a market that has a problem, verses a passionate market.  Good stuff, John.

So, here&#039;s a question: do we want to use agitation/solution on a passionate market, or do we want to instead try to intensify their desire?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,<br />
Simple but important point about them reading your stuff to solve a problem.  NOT to buy your product.  At least, not at first&#8230;</p>
<p>And I agree with the Gene Schwartz Stuff, too.  I&#8217;ve made my clients a lot of money by following his stuff.</p>
<p>And I appreciated the differentiation about agitating a market that has a problem, verses a passionate market.  Good stuff, John.</p>
<p>So, here&#8217;s a question: do we want to use agitation/solution on a passionate market, or do we want to instead try to intensify their desire?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
